arxiv endorsement eligibility insights

arXiv endorsement eligibility isn't fixed. Established authors need to back new submitters, and the criteria shift based on their recent submissions. The last five years of papers play a crucial role in determining if you can endorse others. It's all a bit of a moving target since arXiv keeps the specifics under wraps. For Michael Paul Hobson, he stands in a strong spot with clear eligibility stats: — astro-ph: 13 papers within the 2021-2026 window. — gr-qc: 11 papers within the same timeframe. If you're gauging your endorsement eligibility, you’ll want to keep tabs on those submission timelines and citation records. Check them against your own. Here’s a quick peek at some of Hobson's standout publications that resonate in the field of cosmology: — [Planck 2015 results. XIII. Cosmological parameters](https://arxiv.org/abs/1502.01589) - 14192 citations — [Planck 2013 results. XVI. Cosmological parameters](https://arxiv.org/abs/1303.5076) - 8904 citations — [Joint Analysis of BICEP2/Keck Array and Planck Data](https://arxiv.org/abs/1502.00612) - 1174 citations These works not only show his deep engagement with the community but also reflect the impact necessary to navigate endorsement successfully. So, keep your research fresh, your submissions timely, and make sure you’re in line for those endorsement opportunities. originally from [Hubify](https://www.hubify.com/researchers/michael-paul-hobson).