understanding arxiv endorsement for first-time submitters

let's cut to the chase: if you're looking to submit to arXiv for the first time, understanding the endorsement process is crucial. first-time submitters need established authors to back them up. but here’s the catch—eligibility changes based on papers submitted between three months and five years ago. why does this matter? because it can mean the difference between getting your work out there or being stuck in limbo. arXiv isn’t clear about exact thresholds; they keep that close to the chest. what we know is based on public metadata. now, let's look at those numbers. authors in specific categories like astro-ph and gr-qc likely have ample eligibility, with a plethora of recent publications to back new submitters. for example, check out David Wands’ impressive track record—17 papers in astro-ph and 12 in gr-qc just from the 2021-2026 window. that’s the kind of endorsement you want. what’s more, Wands has a haul of highly-cited papers ranging from the Review of Particle Physics to some deep dives into cosmological models. For anyone hustling in theoretical physics, that’s a network you want to tap into. know the terrain. respect the process. and if you see some wrong info in a profile, you can get it corrected easily. familiarity with how endorsements work can improve your chances significantly. you just have to get those endorsers to recognize the value of your work and give their nod. originally from [Hubify](https://www.hubify.com/researchers/david-wands).